What does battery validation include?

Battery validation proves that cell, module, and pack meet the requirements from the spec sheet and standards — functionally, in terms of safety, and regulatory. It spans requirements analysis, test planning, lab tests (e.g. UN 38.3, IEC 62619), and audit evidence.

Is Cevelar a test lab?

No. Cevelar is software for the step before the lab: extract requirements, check coverage, find gaps, and derive a defensible test plan. Test houses like FEV, Fraunhofer, or Kiwa then run the tests against a complete plan — without expensive rework from missed obligations.

How does test planning cut validation cost?

Missed requirements cause duplicate lab campaigns and audit rework — the most expensive mistakes in validation. Finding gaps before the lab campaign means booking test rigs once instead of multiple times and saving senior-days in follow-up documentation.

Which programs is Cevelar for?

Battery, EV-component, and energy-storage programs at OEMs, Tier-1s, and engineering service providers where spec, standard, and test plan must stay consistent — including ASPICE traceability and the EU Battery Regulation.

Use case · Validation

Make battery validation planable

The most expensive mistakes in battery validation happen before the lab: missed requirements, missing coverage, conflicts between standard and spec sheet. Cevelar finds them early and derives a defensible test plan — so the lab campaign runs once, not three times.

Try the demo Book a founder demo

Coverage before the lab
Gaps early
Audit-ready

Impact

Run the lab campaign once.

Fewer duplicate tests Complete plan before booking

Less rework Gaps before the audit, not in it

Roles

Test lab vs. Cevelar

Test lab (FEV, Fraunhofer, Kiwa …)

RoleRuns the tests
InputNeeds a complete test plan
RiskRework when the plan has gaps

Cevelar

RolePlans & secures coverage
OutputA test plan that forgets nothing
EffectComplements the lab, doesn't replace it

Complete? Is every obligation from the spec sheet captured in a testable requirement?
Covered? Does every requirement have a test case — or does a gap stay clearly flagged?
Conflict-free? IEC 62619 vs. UN 38.3 vs. OEM stress profile — avoid duplicate tests.
Provable? Is traceability ready for audit and ASPICE before anyone asks?

For heads of validation

Coverage is not a feeling.

Early gap and conflict detection, cost and sequence estimates for the lab campaign, and export for Polarion, Jira, or audit. Cevelar delivers this from the spec, EU-hosted — as the planning layer ahead of your test houses.

Try the demo Book a founder demo

Access

Check coverage on a real spec.

Start the demo or book a founder call. Design-partner phase, we reply personally.

Try the demo Book a founder demo

Make battery validation planable

Run the lab campaign once.

Test lab vs. Cevelar

Applications & standards

Check coverage on a real spec.